Prediction of Kimmer Coppejans [286th] vs Illya Marchenko [645th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W L W L
Form
L L L L L L W W L LHead-To-Head: Coppejans 1 - 0 Marchenko
They have played 2 sets in total, with Coppejans winning 2 and Marchenko winning 0. The last match between Coppejans and Marchenko was at the Australian Open Qualifying - Doha, 10-01-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kimmer Coppejans | 1 |
| Illya Marchenko | 0 |
| Coppejans | Stats | Marchenko |
|---|---|---|
| 69% (20-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (2-2) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 286 | Ranking | 645 |
| 97 | Highest Rank | 49 |
| 31 | Age | 37 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 16 | Titles | 12 |
| 59% (465-329) | Career Total W/L | 57% (604-458) |
| $294,830 | Career Prize Money | $1,217,273 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-3 |
Stats 
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Illya Marchenko
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:3:0 | Average Match Time | 2:3:0 |
| 65% (44/68) | 1st Serve % | 55% (42/77) |
| 77% (34/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (26/42) |
| 46% (11/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (17/35) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 44% (34/77) | Return Points Win % | 34% (23/68) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kimmer Coppejans vs Illya Marchenko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Coppejans 1 - 0 Marchenko
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Coppejans has won 41.89% of points on their second serve, while Marchenko has won 40%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Coppejans, in recent form, has won 46.03% of their opponent's second serve points, while Marchenko has won 53.79%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.37% and 20.67% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Coppejans has saved 51.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marchenko has saved 52.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Coppejans has won 75.41% of matches played (W/L 46/ 15), with Marchenko winning 28.57% (W/L 6/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Coppejans has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 140/ 87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9). Marchenko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 231/ 138), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 63/ 85).
- Player level: In the last year, Coppejans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.63% of matches (W/L 21/ 11), where as Marchenko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 35.29% of matches (W/L 6/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Coppejans winning 1 times and Marchenko being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Coppejans winning 2 and Marchenko winning 0. The last match between Coppejans and Marchenko was at the Australian Open Qualifying - Doha, 10-01-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Kimmer Coppejans getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:3:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Coppejans and Marchenko have played a deciding set 0 times, with Coppejans winning 0 times and Marchenko 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Coppejans winning 1, and Marchenko 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Coppejans has played against opponents with an average rank of 356.79 while Marchenko has played against players with an average rank of 298.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Coppejans has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marchenko has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Coppejans has converted 40.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marchenko has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Kimmer Coppejans vs Illya Marchenko Best Odds For The Match
Kimmer Coppejans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
88)
81
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(5) 0-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Radu Albot
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Rincon
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
56%
(
67 of
120)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
53%
(
28 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
44 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Ryan Nijboer
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Izan Corretja
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve %
44%
(
16 of
36)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
70%
(
69 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Elmer Moller
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Sebastian Ofner
43%
(
40 of
92)
1st Serve %
52%
(
63 of
122)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
60%
(
31 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
16 of
59)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
61 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
6
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
33 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
75
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 7-5 11-9 | H2H | ||
view more
Illya Marchenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Cruz Hewitt
Player
Illya Marchenko
25%
(
2 of
8)
1st Serve %
83%
(
5 of
6)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
1 of
2)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
7
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Illya Marchenko
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
12
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
6
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
5
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Joshua Charlton
55%
(
60 of
109)
1st Serve %
76%
(
71 of
94)
18
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
1
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
37 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Illya Marchenko
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
11
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Illya Marchenko
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Illya Marchenko
51%
(
60 of
118)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
14
Aces
11
14
Double Faults
4
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
46 of
56)
52%
(
30 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
40 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
93)
108
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Seongchan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Illya Marchenko
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aidan Mayo
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Coppejans vs Marchenko?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Coppejans Vs Marchenko is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (465/329) | Win/Loss | 57% (604/458) |
| 56% (1057/835) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1422/1123) |
| 53% (9326/8393) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12836/11887) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 2126 | Aces Total | 4028 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1792 | Total Double Faults | 2969 |
| 1:28:38 | Average Match Time | 1:14:14 |
| 493.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 550.19 |
| 65% (31119/48203) | 1st Serve % | 57% (34438/59903) |
| 67% (20891/31119) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (24897/34438) |
| 49% (8295/17084) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (12818/25456) |
| 43% (2339/5378) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (2330/5660) |
| 42% (20668/49329) | Return Points Win % | 38% (23028/59962) |
| 59% (459/781) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (570/1002) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 49% (23/47) |
| 55% (117/212) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (210/421) |
| 57% (167/294) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (172/369) |
| 84% (433/363) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (595/493) |
| 16% (433/69) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (595/102) |
| 28% (361/101) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (466/110) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
